From manningc2@actrix.gen.nz Mon Apr 12 00:41:17 2010
Received: from pop.scorch.co.nz ([203.167.210.162] helo=scorch.co.nz)
	by stoneboat.aleph1.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <manningc2@actrix.gen.nz>) id 1O16mA-0005Sd-6Q
	for balloon@balloonboard.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 00:41:16 +0100
Received: (qmail 5883 invoked by uid 453); 11 Apr 2010 23:41:06 -0000
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on scorch.co.nz
Received: from Unknown (HELO linux-dual-head.local) (10.14.210.25)
	by scorch.co.nz (qpsmtpd/0.40) with ESMTP;
	Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:41:06 +1200
From: Charles Manning <manningc2@actrix.gen.nz>
To: balloon@balloonboard.org
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:41:06 +1200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10
References: <20100409170638.GS7110@dream.aleph1.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20100409170638.GS7110@dream.aleph1.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <201004121141.06325.manningc2@actrix.gen.nz>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 203.167.210.162
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: manningc2@actrix.gen.nz
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on
	stoneboat.aleph1.co.uk
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=4.5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_NEUTRAL
	autolearn=no version=3.2.5
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on stoneboat.aleph1.co.uk)
Cc: Wookey <wookey@wookware.org>
Subject: Re: [Balloon] Openocd status
X-BeenThere: balloon@balloonboard.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Balloon List <balloon.balloonboard.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://balloonboard.org/mailman/options/balloon>,
	<mailto:balloon-request@balloonboard.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://balloonboard.org/lurker/list/balloon.html>
List-Post: <mailto:balloon@balloonboard.org>
List-Help: <mailto:balloon-request@balloonboard.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://balloonboard.org/mailman/listinfo/balloon>,
	<mailto:balloon-request@balloonboard.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 23:41:17 -0000


By some remarkable coincidence I opened this as I got of the phone too someone 
having very problems on a a different board which had worked fine a couple of 
weeks ago.

On Saturday 10 April 2010 05:06:39 Wookey wrote:
<snip>
> And how come the CPLD boards work when chained but not stand-alone?
<snip>

Hooking them into a chain redrives or modifies the signals.

This sounds very much like a signal integrity issue. If the scan chains are 
wrong then look at what the all the lines are doing. Don't forget to check 
the reset line too.

-- Charles



